Summarizing a source
Watch the video, read the short explanation, then practice checking summaries.
Video not loading? Watch it on YouTube (opens in a new tab).
In short
A summary is the main point of a longer source in far fewer words. Summarize when you need the big picture and the details do not matter to your audience. A good summary:
- Is much shorter than the source: a sentence or two for an article.
- Keeps the source’s main point and emphasis.
- Is not a play-by-play of the source in its own order.
- Adds no opinions. If you want to evaluate the source, do it in a separate sentence.
- Is cited, like everything else, with the author and year.
Review: Check the summary
Read each example and decide what is wrong. Then click to check. The sources are made up.
Example 1: A play-by-play
Source: Alvarez (2021) followed 60 first-year teachers for a year. Teachers who met weekly with a mentor reported less stress and were more likely to stay in teaching.
Click to reveal the fix
What changed: The first version retells the source in its order and never says what the study found. The better version gives the main point in one sentence.
Example 2: An opinion is mixed in
Source: Kim (2020) reported that students who tutored classmates gained as much as the students they tutored.
Click to reveal the fix
What changed: A summary keeps the source’s point, not your opinion. The better version summarizes first, then evaluates in a separate sentence.
Example 3: Too many details
Source: Rao (2020) surveyed 800 families in 12 districts about after-school programs. Cost and transportation were the biggest barriers. Programs that offered free bus service had 30% higher enrollment.
Click to reveal the fix
What changed: The first version is almost as long as the source because it keeps the numbers and the method. A summary drops the details on purpose and keeps the main point.