Annoying Ways People Use Sources
Watch the video, read Kyle Stedman's essay for more detail, then practice fixing common problems with quotes.
Watch the video
Video not loading? Watch it on YouTube (opens in a new tab).
Read the essay
The video is based on an essay by Kyle Stedman. Read it for more detail and many more examples.
“Annoying Ways People Use Sources” by Kyle Stedman (opens in a new tab)
Practice
Each example below has an annoying version. Read it and decide what is wrong. Then click to reveal the fix. A good use of a source follows three moves: prepare the reader, quote, then analyze.
These examples use the sample topics for the OQTA packet (Therac-25) and the SQYD packet (the Tropicana 2009 packaging redesign). The sources are made up, so you will not find them in a library.
Example 1 (OQTA packet): The quote shows up from nowhere
Click to reveal the fix
What changed: The better version names the source with a noun (one investigation) and a past-tense verb (described) to set up the quote. The citation stays in parentheses at the end, which keeps the focus on the event instead of the author.
Example 2 (SQYD packet): Who said it, and where?
Click to reveal the fix
What changed: Naming the source with a noun (one book on package design) tells the reader what kind of source it is, but it does not replace the citation. The citation goes in parentheses after the quote, with the author's last name, the year, and the page number. The period goes after the parentheses. The full source also needs an entry in your References list, with a hanging indent:
Alvarez, M. (2018). Shelf impact: How shoppers read package design. Studio Press.
Example 3 (OQTA packet): The quote just sits there
Click to reveal the fix
What changed: After the quote, the writer explains what it means and why it matters. Never leave the reader to guess why you included a quote.